[Exherbo-dev] RFC: Switch default "jpeg" provider to jpeg-turbo
calvin.walton at kepstin.ca
Wed Mar 30 16:06:07 UTC 2016
After zlin reported on IRC about a test failure when using "ijg-jpeg"
implementation that don't happen for people using "jpeg-turbo", I was
wondering why our default jpeg provider is still the ijg library.
Many other distributions have switched to using jpeg-turbo (at least by
default), including Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, RHEL, SUSE. As a result, a
lot of current software isn't well tested with that library.
As a bonus, jpeg-turbo has committed to maintaining abi stability - no
more rebuilding lots of packages with a new major jpeg library release.
And so I propose to change the default provider used in Exherbo to
jpeg-turbo. Does anyone have any objections to that?
There's still a couple packages that depend on media-libs/jpeg directly
that should be taken care of, but since jpeg-turbo is compatible with
the common jpeg-6b api, this usually just requires a dependency change
Obviously this would only change the default, and if someone wants to
use one of the non-standard jpeg encodings supported by ijg's jpeg-8 or
jpeg-9, they're welcome to switch it.
Calvin Walton <calvin.walton at kepstin.ca>
More information about the Exherbo-dev