[Exherbo-dev] Dropping the ipv6 option globally

Bryan Østergaard bryan.ostergaard at gmail.com
Wed Dec 11 17:34:48 UTC 2013

Killing options is (almost) always a good idea. I'm all for it :)


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Wulf C. Krueger <wk at mailstation.de> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello!
> It's the time of year again during which we traditionally discuss the
> removal of the "ipv6" option. (I've checked my IRC logs since 2008 and
> we always discussed this during autumn for some reason! :-) )
> Recently, we got a patch
> (https://galileo.mailstation.de/gerrit/#/c/298/) to disable the ipv6
> option for NSPR.
> I'm *not* in favour of that specific patch because it would mean we
> would basically arbitrarily remove the ipv6 option from random
> packages, not knowing what might break. Instead, I'd like us to just
> drop the ipv6 option *completely*.
> Personally, I've been running every single machine for the last 5
> years or so with IPv6 enabled globally - nothing ever broke. And that
> was independent of the actual existence of IPv6 connectivity (which I
> didn't always have).
> As for the argument that things might break if someone doesn't compile
> IPv6 support into his kernel - things are likely to break if you don't
> compile-in support for your CPU either. Just don't do that then.
> We should, of course, add some instructions about that to our
> documentation but that's something I'll gladly do.
> Comments?
> (Please speak up, too, if you're in favour of my proposal; I'm looking
> at you, Heiko and Saleem! ;-) )
> - --
> Best regards, Wulf
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> iEYEARECAAYFAlKomLwACgkQnuVXRcSi+5rKVgCgtjpDa9nD6mywBiUYw0lRJjrz
> =wxDt
> _______________________________________________
> Exherbo-dev mailing list
> Exherbo-dev at lists.exherbo.org
> http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev

More information about the Exherbo-dev mailing list