[paludis-user] reconcilio and SEARCH_DIRS_MASK

Renat Golubchyk ragermany at gmx.net
Fri Apr 10 20:17:13 UTC 2009


Hi all!

After upgrading dev-libs/icu from 3.8.1-r1 to 4.0.1 openoffice got
broken. "ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin" shows that
libicuuc.so.38 and libicule.so.38 can't be found. But running
reconcilio gives

reconcilio at 1239388553: [DEBUG reconcilio.broken_linkage_finder.config]
In thread ID '4635': ... In program reconcilio --pretend --library
libicuuc.so.38--log-level debug: ... When performing the Fix Linkage
action: ... When loading broken linkage checker configuration for '/':
  ... When adding default settings:
  ... Got LD_LIBRARY_MASK="libodbcinst.so libodbc.so libjava.so
libjvm.so" reconcilio at 1239388553: [DEBUG
reconcilio.broken_linkage_finder.config] (same context) Got
SEARCH_DIRS="/bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /lib* /usr/lib*"
reconcilio at 1239388553: [DEBUG reconcilio.broken_linkage_finder.config]
(same context) Got
SEARCH_DIRS_MASK="/opt/OpenOffice /usr/lib*/openoffice /lib*/modules"
reconcilio at 1239388553: [DEBUG reconcilio.broken_linkage_finder.config] 
(same context) Default ld.so.conf contents is "/lib /usr/lib"


Obviously, /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin doesn't get checked
by reconcilio. I haven't found any file under /etc where
/usr/lib*/openoffice gets appended to SEARCH_DIRS_MASK. Where does
reconcilio actually look for the SEARCH_DIRS and SEARCH_DIRS_MASK
variables?


Cheers,
Renat

-- 
Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen,
durch die sie entstanden sind.
                                              (Einstein)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.exherbo.org/pipermail/paludis-user/attachments/20090410/690325c7/attachment.asc>


More information about the paludis-user mailing list