[Exherbo-dev] Exherbo-dev Digest, Vol 103, Issue 4

Gauthier P. kendos.kenlen at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 13:05:37 UTC 2016


Hi,

As a user, I agree that Gerrit isn't user friendly nor easy to use. The
interface is ugly and understanding how it works when you never used it is
a bit a pain.
I used Gitlab multiple times and I prefer it. It's more user friendly,
easier to use and it offers an easy way to navigate through repositories.

Using gitlab.com could be a good idea as we don't need to maintain the
gitlab ourself but having our own gitlab looks better has we have a full
hand on it (it's just a pain to maintain from what I heard).

Sincerely,
Kendos-Kenlen

Le mer. 21 déc. 2016 à 13:54, Irvin Choi <simdol8080 at gmail.com> a écrit :

> I would like to follow up what Somasis has said in the last email. I
> currently do have a GitLab server, mirroring Exherbo's git servers
> intending to create a mirror for faster git access for Exherbo users. I
> submitted a patch about adding this to Eherbo website few months ago (might
> be less or more) but was not approved. If anyone is interested, I am
> willing to provide server for gitlab for Exherbo community. I've made this
> proposal to philantrop, but he has denied my proposal stating that gerrit
> will be used instead. Although it is not my intention to bring this up as a
> way to dismiss philantrop's wishes, I am generally curious about what
> others (including developers), think about replacing Gerrit with gitlab. I
> own a VPS with NGINX server, so that is not much a problem for me.
>
> Thanks!
> Simdol
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:00 PM, <exherbo-dev-request at lists.exherbo.org>
> wrote:
>
> Send Exherbo-dev mailing list submissions to
>         exherbo-dev at lists.exherbo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         exherbo-dev-request at lists.exherbo.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         exherbo-dev-owner at lists.exherbo.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Exherbo-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: To Gerrit or not to Gerrit ... (Kylie McClain)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:43:47 -0500
> From: Kylie McClain <kylie at somasis.com>
> To: kim at khh.dk
> Cc: exherbo-dev at lists.exherbo.org
> Subject: Re: [Exherbo-dev] To Gerrit or not to Gerrit ...
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAOji9TDypvPpiAMDLhUdg6HFnsJEX53aiNnhZwwLqvdhCL5VGg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:03 PM,  <kim at khh.dk> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wulf: I am not trying to step on your work, let me know if you think it
> > should be done otherwise
> >
> > We are currently in the situation that the main place for our code
> reviews
> > is gone which is unfortunate.  I would like to put in some work to change
> > that, preferably in a way where multiple "sys-admin" Exherbo developers
> can
> > help each other maintain it.
> >
> > Since Gerrit is not the easiest piece of software to setup/maintain and
> > since I personally do not prefer the Gerrit workflow (making it as hard
> as
> > possible to work on a branch of commits and creating a tendency for devs
> to
> > create large commits to make it easier for the review process) I would
> like
> > to ask if you think:
> >
> > - We need Gerrit back
> >
> > or
> >
> > - We need a place to help review code
>
> GitLab.com might be an option.
>
> Pros:
> - We put maintenance of code review infrastructure on another group
> - Open-source (MIT/expat license), so we can self-host if we want to
> - Has a lot of integration plugins already implemented; Jenkins, Irker...
> - Has two-way mirroring like Gerrit
> - Allows for three different merge request workflows (merge commits
> vs. rebasing); this is useful for how Paludis' repo is maintained
> since merge commits are common on it, but our repos use rebasing
> - Has options for only letting merge requests be merged if they pass tests
> - Repositories, issues, etc. can be exported if we ever want to self-host
> - Has many login options: GitHub, Google, Twitter, BitBucket
>
> Cons:
> - We put maintenance of code review infrastructure on another group,
> so if they go down for a bit, we lose code review functionality
> - CLI clients are a little lacking (however
> https://github.com/numa08/git-gitlab looks promising imo)
> - You could argue that the public instance (GitLab.com) is a little
> slow in terms of response speed at times.
>
> That said, self-hosting is an option. I was at first thinking we could
> do that, but then maintaining it on my VPS came to be a bit of a
> hassle (mostly due to them recommending nginx, and I want to use
> lighttpd...). Plus, GitLab.com is already here, it requires less set
> up or maintenance on our part, and so far they've been pretty good
> with uptime. They upgrade to the newest GitLab release on the 22nd of
> every month, they announce maintainence periods, and overall I think
> it's better than something like GitHub for the fact that it's
> open-source and we aren't as locked in to one vendor as we would be if
> we used them.
>
> Thoughts? In the mean time I created a group on GitLab.com at
> https://gitlab.com/exherbo so we can test it a little if desired; just
> ask me to add you to the group if you want to.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Exherbo-dev mailing list
> Exherbo-dev at lists.exherbo.org
> http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Exherbo-dev Digest, Vol 103, Issue 4
> *******************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Exherbo-dev mailing list
> Exherbo-dev at lists.exherbo.org
> http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.exherbo.org/pipermail/exherbo-dev/attachments/20161221/69520aa1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Exherbo-dev mailing list